Multi-User Task Offloading in UAV-Assisted LEO Satellite Edge Computing: A Game-Theoretic Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-assisted Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite edge computing (ULSE) networks can address the challenge communications issues in areas with harsh terrain and achieve global wireless coverage to provide services for mobile user devices (MUDs). This paper studies the LEO-UAV task offloading problem where MUDs compete for limited resources in the ULSE networks. We formulate the optimization problem with the goal of minimizing the cost of all MUDs while meeting resource constraint and satellite coverage time constraint. We first theoretically prove that this problem is NP-hard. We then reformulate the problem as a LEO-UAV task offloading game (LUTO-Game), and show that there is at least one Nash equilibrium solution for the LUTO-Game. We propose a joint UAV and LEO satellite task offloading (JULTO) algorithm to obtain the Nash equilibrium offloading strategy, and analyze the performance of the worst-case offloading strategy obtained by the JULTO algorithm. Finally, extensive experiments, including convergence analysis and comparison experiments, are carried out to validate the effectiveness of our JULTO algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it