MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402810260 · doi:10.1002/symb.1209

A Leisure Approach to Sex in Research

2024· article· en· W4402810260 on OpenAlexaff
Pouya Morshedi

Bibliographic record

VenueSymbolic Interaction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Roles and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Responding to the relationship between sex and leisure shapes this edited book.While sex and sexuality have been the topic of many scholarly works, mostly from inequality, deviance, and labor studies perspectives, this book puts "sex as leisure" at the core of the discussions.The sex-positive approach in the chapters challenges the traditional sex-negative approach in different disciplines and research areas.Berdychevsky and Carr gathered scholars from different humanities, social sciences, and health disciplines.It gives readers a wide range of discussions on sex as a leisure in various areas, including but not limited to race studies, dis/ability studies, tourism, and media studies.Before presenting eight chapters in this edited book, Berdychevsky and Carr provide an introduction frame "sex as leisure" to set a base for further discussions and analysis.The interdisciplinary approach of editors in gathering scholarly works around the theme of "sex as leisure" makes this book novel.In the first substantive chapter, Positive Sexuality as a Guide for Leisure Research and Practice Addressing Sexual Interests and Behaviors, Williams, Prior, and Vincent provide a multidisciplinary framework by reviewing existing literature on positive sexuality and its relationship to leisure studies.Their attention to the context and interactions among individuals in this study provides a flexible framework to discuss positive sexuality and sexual behaviors.The authors add the positive sexuality approach to sex and sexual behavior instead of declining discussions on risks related to these behaviors.It helps to shape more scholarly negotiations around sexual behavior rather than a battle between opposite approaches.The concept of escapism is discussed in leisure studies and the sociology of tourism in various ways.Tourism has become an escape from everyday routine life and the workplace.In the same vein, Piha, Huemerinta, Järvinen, Räikkönen, and Sandberg discuss the sexual play as an escape strategy from everyday stress in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymbolic InteractionSame topicGender Roles and Identity StudiesFrench-language works237,207