MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physical Layer Security-assisted Partial Computation Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing

2024· article· en· W4402810789 on OpenAlexaff
Xue Qin, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputation offloadingEdge computingMobile edge computingLayer (electronics)Mobile computingComputationComputer networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionServerMaterials scienceAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With mobile edge computing (MEC), resource-constrained Internet of Things (IoT) users can offload computation tasks to edge servers in proximity for processing, which can reduce the service latency and energy consumption. Due to the broadcast nature of wireless communications, sensitive information can be leaked during computation offloading, in presence of adversaries or eavesdroppers. This work aims to improve the latency, energy efficiency and security in computation offloading in dynamic MEC environments. Specifically, partial offloading strategy is considered and a physical layer security-assisted scheme is developed to achieve multiple objectives, including maximizing the number of completed tasks before their respective deadlines and minimizing energy consumption, while providing enhanced security in a long run. A Markov decision process (MDP) with discrete-continuous action spaces is formulated and a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method named hybrid-action deep deterministic policy gradient (HDDPG) is proposed to optimize the offloading ratio, friendly jammer selection, and computing power allocation. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed HDDPG outperform the state-of-art deep DRL baselines in terms of the number of completed tasks before deadlines and energy costs while satisfying the security requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207