MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transmission Protocol Customization for On-demand Tile-based 360° VR Video Streaming

2024· article· en· W4402811131 on OpenAlexaff
Yannan Wei, Qiang Ye, Kaige Qu, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTilePersonalizationProtocol (science)Virtual realityReal Time Streaming ProtocolOn demandTransmission (telecommunications)Video on demandComputer networkVideo streamingMultimediaHuman–computer interactionOperating systemTelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tile-based streaming has been proposed to address the challenge of high transmission rate demand in 360° virtual reality (VR) video streaming. However, it suffers from network condition dynamics and viewer field-of-view (FoV) prediction errors. In this paper, we propose a customized transmission protocol based on Quick UDP Internet Connections (QUIC) which operates over a VR video core network slice to support enhanced slice-level VR video data transmission. The QUIC protocol is tailored to accommodate the characteristics of tile-based VR video streaming where explicit mapping relations between requested video tiles and QUIC streams are established. Two customized protocol functionalities including packet filtering and caching-based packet retransmission are proposed, which filter out outdated video data due to FoV prediction errors and achieve efficient packet loss recovery, respectively. A slice-level packet header is designed to support enhanced slice-based VR video packet transmissions with the proposed protocol functionalities. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed protocol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207