MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402811315 · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2024.1474323

Editorial: Spatial and temporal monitoring of wildfire hazard under a climate change environment: prevention, mitigation and management

2024· editorial· en· W4402811315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stavros Sakellariou, Palaiologos Palaiologou, Anastasia Κ. Paschalidou, Michael Vrahnakis, Olga Christopoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Forests and Global Change · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeHazardEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningEcologyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildfire is a natural phenomenon that may become a disaster if it crosses the boundaries of natural and anthropogenic ecosystems. During the last 20 years (2001 – 2021), 119 million ha of tree cover have been consumed by fires on a global scale, accounting for almost 37% of total forest losses occurred in this period. Future projections predict that, under a climate change environment, the fire season, especially in Southern Europe, will be prolonged with higher duration and severity of droughts, leading to higher fire severity and burned area. The purpose of this special issue was to highlight recent research related to the spatio-temporal monitoring of wildfire hazards, linked with the climate change dimensions of wildfire hazard dynamics. This synergy can potentially allow the spatial determination and development of the most appropriate preventative measures in the most vulnerable regions. Within this context, interdisciplinary approaches over the broader field of wildfires were highly welcomed. This Research Topic accepted manuscripts that showcase unique empirical strategies and use of new and innovative data sources, novel theoretical contributions and the integration of findings and theories across multiple disciplines that deal with the topic of wildfires.Fan et al. investigated the performances of traditional semi-physical models (Nelson method and Simard method), contemporary machine learning modelling (Random Forest model), generalized additive model, and a linear regression model to explore the dynamic change of fine fuel moisture content (FFMC) and its driving factors. Performance assessment was conducted on the values of the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the models. Data were obtained from a mountainous and hilly study area that have dense forest cover in the Maoer Mountain Experimental Forest Farm of Northeast Forestry University in Harbin, China. Researchers collected surface litter from four different forest plantations and the real-time FFMC and meteorological data at half-hour intervals, spanning the full fall fire season. It was found that that the semi-physical models performed best, the machine learning model and generalized additive model performed slightly worse, and the linear regression model performed worst. The results of the model comparison in this study could be useful for forest fire management and prediction in Northeast China and have reference value for the future research direction of the FFMC prediction model, as well.A solution was proposed by Yemshanov et al. in order to deal with a practical problem related to the effect of preventive treatments of vegetation against forest fires sustaining the provision of wildlife services. A network optimization approach was used to define locations across high-voltage power lines inside a forest proposed for fuel management of their understorey vegetation. The question was, what is the best location for fuel treatments allocation in order, from one hand, not to harm the crossing powerlines and the ecological connectivity of the populations of boreal woodland caribou, and from the other side to minimize fire risk caused by the high-voltage power lines. The authors developed a model that combined a Critical Node Detection (CND) problem with a habitat connectivity problem in the area surrounding Hydro-Québec’s proposed connectivity corridor in northeastern Québec, Canada. The model identified the best locations to perform fuel treatments to reduce the threat of potential fire damage by 36–39% under the current and by 20–31% under the future climate for 2070, while maintaining a connectivity corridor. Limitations, mostly due to natural variability, are discussed and possible solutions were proposed.Nowadays, the use of satellite image data is widely used in the assessment of forest fires impact. The KazEOSat-1 high-resolution satellite datasets were used by Suresh Babu et al. to map the burnt area in the regions of Kazakhstan. The KazEOSat-1 satellite is in a sun-synchronous orbit, consisting of four bands (blue, green, red, and NIR multispectral bands, in 4 m spatial resolution) while panchromatic data (in 1 m spatial resolution) are also obtained. Three spectral indices—Global Environmental Monitoring Index (GEMI), Ashburn Vegetation Index (AVI), and Burn Area Index (BAI) were tested for mapping burnt areas using datasets obtained by KazEOSat-1. The results of indices were compared based on a Discriminative Index (M) for quantifying the effectiveness of each index based on burned area. It was found that the BAI index had higher M values compared to the other tested indices, and this index had the higher capability to extract the burned area. A further accuracy analysis showed that the BAI has again the highest ability for extracting the burned area using the KazEOSat-1 satellite datasets. As the revisit time period of KazEOSat-1 is 3 days, this study will be useful to map the burnt area and fire progression in Kazakhstan.Hu et al. investigated the characteristics of forest fire spread and the applicability of a coupled fire-atmospheric wildfire model (WRF-Fire) in China. The study simulated a high-intensity forest fire event in Xintian County, China. Authors used high-resolution geographic information, meteorological observation and fuel classification data to analyze wildfire behavior and compared the simulation results with the burned area observed by satellite remote sensing forest fire monitoring data. It was found that the simulated wind speed, direction and temperature trends are similar to the observation results. Authors also found that the simulated wind speed is overestimated, the dominant wind direction is from north (N), and the temperature is slightly underestimated. The simulation results showed that the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of the local wind field are found under complex terrain while obtaining the high-resolution wind field. The simulated burned area was generally overestimated. It is concluded that the model can accurately reproduce the real spread of fire, a finding that can be utilized by forest fire managers. Overall, modern approaches and technologies accommodated in this special issue can be helpful to agencies and policy makers to set up robust strategies to prevent forest fires and reduce their negative impacts on nature and society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Forests and Global ChangeSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207