MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Hybrid Ensemble Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for the Internet of Things

2024· article· en· W4402811690 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed M. Alani, Ali Ismail Awad, Ezedin Barka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersZayed UniversityUnited Arab Emirates University
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemComputer scienceInternet of ThingsEnsemble learningThe InternetArtificial intelligenceComputer securityMachine learningWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The applications of the Internet of Things (IoT) have grown significantly both in scope and complexity. IoT devices are becoming an integral part of our daily lives. This significant growth in IoT adoption is accompanied by a substantial increase in the interest of malicious actors. IoT devices are a preferred target for malicious actors due to their inherent vulnerabilities and limited computational resources, which make them difficult to protect and secure. This study introduces a novel ensemble learning-based intrusion detection system (IDS) using network flow features. The goal of the proposed system is to achieve both simplicity and high detection accuracy. The novelty behind the system lies in using a new feature called “history”, extracted from flow information, combined with traditional features. The core classification engine includes bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifiers, with a decision tree (DT) classifier finalizing the decision-making process. The proposed system has been evaluated using a public IoT network dataset with an accomplished accuracy of 99.6%. The system has achieved results comparable to those of other systems that are more complex. The obtained results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed ensemble learning-based system in comparison to conventional network-flow-based intrusion detection systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207