MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402813206 · doi:10.1016/j.dche.2024.100188

A hybrid BOA-SVR approach for predicting aerobic organic and nitrogen removal in a gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed bioreactor

2024· article· en· W4402813206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Chemical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioreactorNitrogenFluidized bedFluidized bed combustionNitrogen gasMaterials scienceProcess engineeringWaste managementChemistryEnvironmental scienceEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces the hybrid of the Bayesian optimization algorithm and support vector regression (BOA-SVR) models to predict the removal of aerobic organic (total chemical oxygen demand, COD) and nitrogen compounds such as total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), ammonium nitrogen (NH 4 -N), and nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 -N) from municipal wastewater in a gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed (GLSCFB) bioreactor. GLSCFB bioreactors treat wastewater by removing nutrients biologically. The downer of a GLSCFB bioreactor provided experimental data on TKN, NH 4 -N, NO 3 -N, and TCOD removal. The hybrid optimal intelligence algorithm (BOA-SVR) has improved model accuracy across multiple domains by combining BOA and SVR. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), residual, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and fractional bias (FB) were used to analyze BOA-SVR model performance. The models match experimental data from four operational stages well, with R 2 or adj R 2 values above 0.99 for all responses. The model's accuracy was confirmed by relative deviations and residual plots showing dispersion around the zero-reference line. The BOA-SVR model consistently predicted dependent variables with low RMSE and MAE values (≤ 2.24 and 2.21, respectively) and near-zero FB. Computing efficiency was shown by optimizing TCOD, TKN, NH4-N, and NO3-N models in 70.61, 72.89, 74.37, and 54.07 s. A rigorous test on unseen data with different noise levels confirmed the model's stability. Furthermore, BOA-SVR performs better than traditional multiple linear regression (MLR). Overall, the BOA-SVR model predicts biological nutrient removal in municipal wastewater utilizing a GLSCFB bioreactor quickly, correctly, and efficiently, reducing experimental stress and resource use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it