Estimating Non-Stationary Extreme-Value Probability Distribution Shifts and Their Parameters Under Climate Change Using L-Moments and L-Moment Ratio Diagrams: A Case Study of Hydrologic Drought in the Goat River Near Creston, British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, we investigate the use of rolling-windowed L-moments (RWLMs) and L-moment ratio diagrams (LMRDs) combined with a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) machine learning algorithm to model non-stationary low-flow hydrological extremes with the potential to simultaneously understand time-variant shape, scale, location, and probability distribution (PD) shifts under climate change. By employing LMRDs, we analyse changes in PDs and their parameters over time, identifying key environmental predictors such as lagged precipitation for September 5-day low-flows. Our findings indicate a significant relationship between total August precipitation L-moment ratios (LMRs) and September 5-day low-flow LMRs (τ2-Precipitation and τ2-Discharge: R2 = 0.675, p-values < 0.001; τ3-Precipitation and τ3-Discharge: R2 = 0.925, p-value for slope < 0.001, intercept not significant with p = 0.451, assuming α = 0.05 and a 31-year RWLM), which we later refine and use for prediction within our MLR algorithm. The methodology, applied to the Goat River near Creston, British Columbia, aids in understanding the implications of climate change on water resources, particularly for the yaqan nuʔkiy First Nation. We find that future low-flows under climate change will be outside the Natural Range of Variability (NROV) simulated from historical records (assuming a constant PD). This study provides insights that may help in adaptive water management strategies necessary to help preserve Indigenous cultural rights and practices and to help sustain fish and fish habitat into the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".