MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402814792 · doi:10.3390/nu16193236

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of a Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet in Women with Obesity and Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Interventional Study

2024· article· en· W4402814792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacopo Ciaffi, Luana Mancarella, Giulia Pederzani, Lucia Lisi, Veronica Brusi, Federica Pignatti, Susanna Ricci, Giorgia Vitali, Cesare Faldini, Francesco Ursini

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrients · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineKetogenic dietOsteoarthritisObesityCalorieInternal medicinePhysical therapyAdverse effectAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Obesity is a major risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA), and weight loss is crucial for its management. This pilot study explores the effects of a Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet (VLCKD) in women with obesity and symptomatic knee OA. Methods: Women with symptomatic knee OA and obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, were eligible for the VLCKD protocol. The intervention included a ketogenic phase from baseline (T0) to the 8th week (T8), followed by a progressive reintroduction of carbohydrates over the next 12 weeks, ending at the 20th week (T20). Body mass index (BMI), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were assessed at all time points. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the association between BMI and patient-reported outcomes across the study period. Results: Twenty participants started the study, but four discontinued the intervention, with two of these being due to adverse effects. The mean age of the 16 patients who completed the 20-week program was 57.3 ± 5.5 years, and their mean BMI was 40.0 ± 4.8 kg/m2. The mean BMI significantly decreased to 37.5 ± 4.5 at T4, 36.3 ± 4.6 at T8, and 34.8 ± 4.8 at T20 (all p < 0.001 compared to baseline). The total WOMAC score improved from a mean of 43.6 ± 16.9 at T0 to 30.2 ± 12.8 at T4 (p = 0.005) and further to 24.7 ± 10.6 at T8 (p = 0.001) and to 24.8 ± 15.9 at T20 (p = 0.005). The reduction in BMI was significantly correlated with the improvements in WOMAC, EQ-5D, and SF-36 over time. No major adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: A 20-week VLCKD in women with obesity and knee OA significantly reduced their weight and improved their outcomes, warranting further research. This trial is registered with number NCT05848544 on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrientsSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207