Microbial community storm dynamics signal sources of “old” stream water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate characterization of the movement of water through catchments, particularly during precipitation event response, is critical for hydrological efforts such as contaminant transport modeling or prediction of extreme flows. Abiotic hydrogeochemical tracers are commonly used to track sources and ages of surface waters but provide limited details about transit pathways or the spatial dynamics of water storage and release. Alternatively, biotic material in streams is derived from thousands of taxa originating from a variety of environments within watersheds, including groundwater, sediment, and upslope terrestrial environments, and this material can be characterized with genetic sequencing and bioinformatics. We analyzed the stable water isotopes (δ18O and δ2H) and microbiome composition (16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) of the Marys River of western Oregon, USA during an early season storm to describe the processes, storage, and flowpaths that shape surface water hydrology. Stable water isotopes (δ18O and δ2H) typified an event response in which stream water is composed largely of 'old' water introduced to the catchment before the storm, a common though not well understood phenomenon. In contrast, microbial biodiversity spiked during the storm, consisting of early- and late-event communities clearly distinguishable from pre-event communities. We applied concentration-discharge (cQ) analysis to individual microbial taxa and found that most Alphaproteobacteria sequences were positively correlated (i.e., were mobilized) with discharge, whereas most sequences from phyla Gammaproteobacteria and Bacteroidota were negatively correlated with discharge (i.e., were diluted). Source predictions using the prokaryote habitat preference database ProkAtlas found that freshwater-associated microbes composed a smaller fraction of the microbial community during the stream rise and a larger fraction during the recession, while soil and biofilm-associated microbes increased during the storm and remained high during recession. This suggests that the "old" water discharged during the storm was likely stored and released from, or passed through, soil- and biofilm-rich environments, demonstrating that this approach adds new, biologically derived tracer information about the hydrologic pathways active during and after this event. Overall, this study demonstrates an approach for integrating information-rich DNA into water resource investigations, incorporating tools from both hydrology and microbiology to demonstrate that microbial DNA is useful not only as an indicator of biodiversity but also functions as an innovative hydrologic tracer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".