MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402822909 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkae332

Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided piperacillin dosing in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review

2024· review· en· W4402822909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nazatul Adhwa Mohd Rozi, Nor Asyikin Mohd Tahir, Shamin Mohd Saffian, Mohd Makmor‐Bakry, Aliza Mohamad Yusof, Ruslinda Mustafar, Muhammad Nordin M Saud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
KeywordsPiperacillinDosingMedicineTherapeutic drug monitoringRenal replacement therapyIntensive care medicinePiperacillin/tazobactamPharmacokineticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) complicates antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients due to altered pharmacokinetics. The optimal dosing of piperacillin remains unclear. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can personalize piperacillin therapy and improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This review investigates the effects of TDM-guided piperacillin dosing on pharmacokinetic target attainment and clinical outcomes in CRRT patients, analyses correlations with clinical outcomes, provides optimal dosing strategies for piperacillin and identifies future research areas. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted until December 2023, identifying studies on piperacillin pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes in adult CRRT patients. Data on study characteristics, piperacillin exposures, TDM use, target attainment rates, mortality and length of stay were extracted. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Eleven observational studies were included. High pharmacokinetic variability was evident, with piperacillin target non-attainment in up to 74% of cases without TDM. Two studies with routine TDM showed increased target attainment rates of 80%-100%. Mortality ranged from 17% to 56%, with supratherapeutic concentrations (≥100 mg/L) associated with higher mortality. The impact of optimized piperacillin exposures on outcomes was inconclusive. Most studies demonstrated a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: TDM-guided piperacillin dosing in CRRT patients improved target attainment rates (≥80%). Mortality rates ranged from 17% to 56%, with inconsistent correlations between drug exposures and survival. Supratherapeutic concentrations were linked to higher mortality. Standardized TDM protocols are needed. Future research should establish clear exposure-response relationships and the impact of TDM on clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207