Quantitative MRI distinguishes different leukodystrophies and correlates with clinical measures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The leukodystrophy "vanishing white matter" (VWM) and "metachromatic leukodystrophy" (MLD) affect the brain's white matter, but have very different underlying pathology. We aim to determine whether quantitative MRI reflects known neuropathological differences and correlates with clinical scores in these leukodystrophies. METHODS: VWM and MLD patients and controls were prospectively included between 2020 and 2023. Clinical scores were recorded. MRI at 3 T included multi-compartment relaxometry diffusion-informed myelin water imaging (MCR-DIMWI) and multi-echo T2-relaxation imaging with compressed sensing (METRICS) to determine myelin water fractions (MWF). Multi-shell diffusion-weighted data were used for diffusion tensor imaging measures and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) analysis, which estimates neurite density index, orientation dispersion index, and free water fraction. As quantitative MRI measures are age-dependent, ratios between actual and age-expected MRI measures were calculated. We performed the multilevel analysis with subsequent post-hoc and correlation tests to assess differences between groups and clinico-radiological correlations. RESULTS: Sixteen control (age range: 2.3-61.3 years, 8 male), 37 VWM (2.4-56.5 years, 20 male), and 14 MLD (2.2-41.7 years, 6 male) subjects were included. Neurite density index and MWF were lower in patients than in controls (p < 0.001). Free water fraction was highest in VWM (p = 0.01), but similar to controls in MLD (p = 0.99). Changes in diffusion tensor imaging measures relative to controls were generally more pronounced in VWM than in MLD. In both patient groups, MCR-DIMWI MWF correlated strongest with clinical measures. CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI correlates to clinical measures and yields differential profiles in VWM and MLD, in line with differences in neuropathology. KEY POINTS: Question Can quantitative MRI reflect known neuropathological differences and correlate with clinical scores for these leukodystrophies? Finding Quantitative MRI measures, e.g., MWF, neurite density index, and free water fraction differ between leukodystrophies and controls, in correspondence to known histological differences. Clinical relevance MRI techniques producing quantitative, biologically-specific, measures regarding the health of myelin and axons deliver more comprehensive information regarding pathological changes in leukodystrophies than current approaches, and are thus viable tools for monitoring patients and providing clinical trial outcome measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".