MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402826139 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00315

Predicting the macrovascular contribution to resting-state fMRI functional connectivity at 3 Tesla: A model-informed approach

2024· article· en· W4402826139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsResting state fMRIFunctional connectivityDefault mode networkPsychologyFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Macrovascular biases have been a long-standing challenge for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), limiting its ability to detect spatially specific neural activity. Recent experimental studies, including our own, found substantial resting-state macrovascular blood-oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI contributions from large veins and arteries, extending into the perivascular tissue at 3 T and 7 T. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of predicting, using a biophysical model, the experimental resting-state BOLD fluctuation amplitude (RSFA) and associated functional connectivity (FC) values at 3 Tesla. We investigated the feasibility of both 2D and 3D infinite-cylinder Models as well as macrovascular anatomical networks (macro-VANs) derived from angiograms. Our results demonstrate that (1) with the availability of macro-VANs, it is feasible to model macrovascular BOLD FC using both the macro-VAN-based model and 3D infinite-cylinder Models, though the former performed better; (2) biophysical modelling can accurately predict the BOLD pair-wise correlation near to large veins (with R2 ranging from 0.53 to 0.93 across different subjects), but not near to large arteries; (3) compared with FC, biophysical modelling provided less accurate predictions for RSFA; (4) modelling of perivascular BOLD connectivity was feasible at close distances from veins (with R2 ranging from 0.08 to 0.57), but not arteries, with performance deteriorating with increasing distance. While our current study demonstrates the feasibility of simulating macrovascular BOLD in the resting state, our methodology may also apply to understanding task-based BOLD. Furthermore, these results suggest the possibility of correcting for macrovascular bias in resting-state fMRI and other types of fMRI using biophysical modelling based on vascular anatomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it