Long-term morbidity and mortality of patients who survived past 30 days from bloodstream infection: A population-based retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For bloodstream infections (BSI), treatment and research have focused on short term mortality. The objective of this study was to describe the 1-year mortality and morbidity in survivors of bloodstream infection when compared to patients with negative blood cultures. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using Ontario administrative databases. Patients were included if they had a blood culture taken from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, and survived past 30 days from blood culture collection. They were followed for the subsequent year. Outcomes were compared among patients with BSI and those without BSI, including all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation, new start dialysis and admission to a long-term care (LTC) facility. Prognostic factors were balanced using overlap weighting of propensity scores, and a survival or competing risk model was used to describe time-to-event. RESULTS: Of 981,341 patients undergoing blood culture testing, 99,080 (10.1%) patients had a BSI and 882,261 (89.9%) patients did not. Outcomes were all more common among those with BSI as compared to those without BSI, including all-cause mortality (16,764 [16.9%] vs. 84,480 [9.6%]), stroke (1016 [1.0%] vs. 4680 [0.5%]), MI (1043 [1.1%] vs. 4547 [0.5%]), CHF exacerbation (2643 [2.7%] vs. 13,200 [1.5%]), new start dialysis (1703 [1.7%] vs. 2749 [0.3%]), and LTC admission (4231 [4.3%] vs. 13,016 [1.5%]). BSI had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI 1.08-1.12, P < 0.0001) for mortality, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) of 1.27 (95% CI 1.19-1.37, P < 0.0001) for stroke, sHR of 1.18 (95% CI 1.10-1.26, P < 0.0001) for MI, sHR of 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.10, P = 0.0176) for CHF exacerbation, sHR of 3.42 (95% CI 3.21-3.64, P < 0.0001) for new start dialysis and sHR of 1.87 (95% CI 1.80-1.94, P < 0.0001) for LTC admission. CONCLUSION: BSI survivors have substantial long-term mortality and morbidity including stroke, MI, new start dialysis and functional decline leading to LTC admission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".