MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402829773 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2024.3467264

Higher-Order Singular Value Tensor Decomposition-Based Tuning Frequency Estimation for FID Signals Under Low SNR

2024· article· en· W4402829773 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjingping Zhang, Huan Liu, Haobin Dong, Zheng Liu, Xiangyun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSingular value decompositionSingular valueTensor (intrinsic definition)MathematicsValue (mathematics)Order (exchange)DecompositionTime–frequency analysisStatisticsAlgorithmPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsChemistryPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency of the free induction decay (FID) signal induced from an Overhauser magnetometer sensor is proportional to the magnetic field to be measured. Due to the low initial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sensor tuning is necessary to suppress the noise and improve the frequency estimation accuracy. To improve the tuning performance in complex strong-disturbance environments, this study introduces a novel method using higher-order singular value tensor decomposition (HOSVTD) and Fourier synchrosqueezing transform (FSST), namely HOSVTD-FSST. First, multiple FID signals are obtained using an equal delay multichannel acquisition strategy to establish a deeper, more intrinsic correlation attribute. Second, matrix segmentation is applied to construct the signals into a higher-order tensor for singular value computation, and the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) decomposition is fused to obtain a low-noise FID. Third, the FSST is employed to analyze the low-noise signal to extract the time-frequency ridges to capture the tuning frequency. Finally, the HOSVTD-FSST is compared with numerous commonly used methods. The experimental results demonstrate that under the presence of spike noise and with the SNR less than −20 dB, the frequency tuning deviations of the commonly used methods are up to 100 Hz, while that of the HOSVTD-FSST is within 5 Hz, which verifies that the HOSVTD-FSST can significantly enhance the sensor tuning accuracy in complex strong-disturbance conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207