Catch-AF—Early Diagnosis of Symptomatic Arrythmias in the Waiting Period Prior to Seeing a Cardiologist in Victoria, British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Given its often-paroxysmal nature, screening at a single time point, using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or a Holter monitor, has limited benefit. The AliveCor KardiaMobile device is a validated ECG recorder that can be used for patient-directed arrhythmia diagnosis and symptom–rhythm correlation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using the KardiaMobile device could reduce the time-to-diagnosis, for AF as well as other arrhythmias. We hypothesized that providing patients with a KardiaMobile device during their waiting period for specialist care could reduce the length of time that passes before ECG detection of arrhythmia. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard monitoring (ECG and a Holter monitor) or enhanced monitoring (ECG, a Holter monitor, and a KardiaMobile device). Patients were instructed to upload ECG recordings if they had cardiac symptoms, so that symptom–rhythm correlation could be achieved. The primary outcome was the time-to-diagnosis for AF. The secondary endpoint was the time-to-diagnosis for any arrhythmias. Results From October 2018 to October 2022, a total of 69 patients were enrolled, and they were followed up to 12 months. Overall, 6 of the 7 patients diagnosed with AF were in the enhanced-monitoring group ( P = 0.106). The time-to-diagnosis was not significantly different in the 2 groups ( P = 0.053). Overall arrhythmias were diagnosed in 10 patients (29%) in the standard-monitoring arm, compared to 22 patients (63%) in the enhanced-monitoring arm ( P = 0.008). The time-to-diagnosis was reduced in the enhanced-monitoring arm ( P = 0.010). Conclusions The time-to-diagnosis of any arrhythmia was reduced significantly in patients randomized to receive KardiaMobile device monitoring. Providing patients with a KardiaMobile device may expedite the diagnosis of arrhythmias during the waiting period for specialist care. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04302311.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".