MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402830242 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3467266

Automated Detection of Acute Respiratory Distress Using Temporal Visual Information

2024· article· en· W4402830242 on OpenAlexafffund
Wajahat Nawaz, Philippe Jouvet, Rita Noumeir

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAcute respiratory distressRespiratory distressComputer visionMedicineInternal medicineLungRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) receives critically ill patients with shortness of breath and poor body oxygenation. Various respiratory parameters, such as respiratory rate, oxygen saturation level, and heart rate, are continuously monitored to timely adapt their management. With the advancement in technology, measurements of most parameters are carried out by medical instruments. However, some crucial parameters are still measured via visual examination, particularly the assessment of chest deformation, which is vital in assessing acute respiratory distress (ARD) conditions. However, visual examination is subjective and intermittent, prone to human error, and challenging to monitor patients round the clock. This subjectivity becomes problematic, especially in areas with a shortage of specialists, such as remote locations, developing countries, or during pandemics. In this paper, we propose an automated acute respiratory distress condition detection system, to address challenges associated with visual examination. The proposed approach utilizes a high-definition camera to capture patient temporal visual information and employs advanced deep-learning models to detect ARD condition. In order to test the feasibility, we collected video data of 153 patients, including both with and without ARD in the PICU. As the deep learning models require substantial amounts of data, and collecting data in the medical domain, particularly in the PICU, poses challenges. To overcome data limited problem, we utilized the problem-specific information, opted transfer learning and data augmentation techniques. Additionally, we compute baseline results of various video analysis algorithms for ARD detection task. Experimental results illustrate that the deep learning base video analysis algorithms have the potential to automate the visual examination process for the ARD detection task, by achieving an accuracy of 0.82, precision of 0.80, recall of 0.89, and$F_{1}$score of 0.84.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207