MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402831316 · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.003

Patiromer for Heart Failure Medication Optimization in Patients With Current or Past Hyperkalemia

2024· article· en· W4402831316 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew J.S. Coats, Stefan D. Anker, Lars H. Lund, Patrick Rossignol, Bertram Pitt, Matthew R. Weir, Mikhail Kosiborod, Marco Metra, Michael Böhm, Justin A. Ezekowitz, Antoni Bayés‐Genís, Robert J. Mentz, Piotr Ponikowski, Michele Senni, John G.F. Cleland, Assen Goudev, Irakli Khintibidze, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Béla Merkely, Sandra Waechter, Jeffrey Budden, Amandine Perrin, Javed Butler

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Heart Failure · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperkalemiaMedicineHeart failureEjection fractionAldosteroneMRASMineralocorticoid receptorInternal medicineCardiologyRenin–angiotensin systemMineralocorticoidBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: For heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), suboptimal use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis), including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), due to hyperkalemia, may be improved by potassium binders. OBJECTIVES: This prespecified analysis of the phase 3 DIAMOND (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure) trial assessed the effect of patiromer in patients with HFrEF and either current or past hyperkalemia. METHODS: ] >5.0 mmol/L) entered a single-blind, run-in phase to optimize RAASis while receiving patiromer. They were subsequently randomized, double-blind, to continue patiromer or change to placebo. RESULTS: = 0.031). Adverse events were similar between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: control and achieve MRA target dose. (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure [DIAMOND]; NCT03888066).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Heart FailureSame topicPotassium and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207