MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402831789 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2024.3468211

Linearization of Fully-Connected Hybrid Beamforming Transmitters Using Analytical Multi-Input Models for Millimeter-Wave Communications

2024· article· en· W4402831789 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Liu, Huanhuan Jia, Yang Lu, Ziyue Zhao, Chupeng Yi, Ting Feng, Xiaohua Ma, Wenhua Chen, Zhenghe Feng, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi ProvinceFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBeamformingLinearizationExtremely high frequencyTransmitterElectronic engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, fully-connected hybrid beamforming (FC-HBF) architecture has aroused widespread interest for millimeter wave (mmWave) massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) communication systems. However, the FC-HBF structure suffers from significant linearity deterioration, limiting its applications in actual mmWave transmitters. To resolve this issue, an effective digital predistortion (DPD) method utilizing analytical multi-input behavioral models is proposed in this paper for linearizing the FC-HBF system. Based on the nonlinearity analysis and behavioral modeling of the array response, three analytical multi-input models are derived by embedding the priori beamforming information in the predistorter. The complexity of the proposed analytical models is significantly reduced compared to the state-of-the-art. Numerical simulations and experimental measurement are carried out on a <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4\times 64$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmWave FC-HBF array and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2\times 16$ </tex-math></inline-formula> quasi-test platform respectively to validate the performance of the proposed DPDs against the state-of-the-art DPDs, which show significant linearization abilities to compensate for the nonlinear distortions of beam signals. The proof-of-the-concept validations in this paper indicate that the proposed scheme is fully capable of linearizing an mmWave FC-HBF array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207