MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Real-Time Embedded Digital Processing Architecture for a Modular Time-of-Flight Computed Tomography Readout Using PETsys TOFPET 2C ASIC

2024· article· en· W4402833941 on OpenAlexaff
F. Gagnon, J. Rossignol, L.-D. Gaulin, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplication-specific integrated circuitModular designComputer scienceArchitectureTime of flightEmbedded systemComputer hardwarePhysicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-of-flight (TOF) in computed tomography (CT) can lead to an increase in image quality with no loss of sensitivity. To implement this approach a modular 256 channels time-of-flight CT using four PETsys TOFPET 2C ASICs is actively being developed. One of the challenges with this system is the quantity of raw data needed to produce the image. On a full-scale CT scanner with the current TOF limitations, up to 120 Tb/s can be generated. To solve this problem, a Zynq-based system on module is used to deserialize the data coming from the four ASICs, do real-time correction and computation of TOF and generate one histogram per channel in a dedicated dual port RAM. With the help of a custom device driver, the histogram data is read directly from the memory and is sent through an Ethernet link to a monitoring PC. The histograms generation and transmission has been tested using simulation data and has been able to handle a data rate superior to the TOFPET 2C ASIC maximum with no dead time for reading the histograms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→