Dual-Polarized High-Isolation Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Full-Duplex mMIMO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dual-polarized high-isolation dielectric resonator antenna for full-duplex massive multiple-input and multiple output is proposed. The design integrates cross-polarized dual ports, utilizing two distinct mechanisms, probe feeding and aperture feeding, to enhance isolation performance. The beamforming capability and Tx-to-Rx port and beam-level isolation with monostatic and bistatic array configurations are studied. The proposed antenna element demonstrates a realized gain of 8.6 dB and a remarkable radiation efficiency of 97.7% at 3.5 GHz. In sample 1×8 array configurations, the design delivers an effective beam steering range from -60 to +60 degrees, with an average directivity and 3dB-beamwidth of 14.9 dB and 16.2 degrees, respectively. When deployed in a monostatic full-duplex array, the proposed structure achieves an average Tx-Rx port isolation of 53.8 dB. Moreover, adopting a bistatic array configuration can further enhance the average beam-level isolation to 73.4 dB, with peak beam-level isolation reaching up to 94.4 dB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".