MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reliable Federated Learning in Vehicular Communication Networks: An Intelligent Vehicle Selection and Resource Optimization Scheme

2024· article· en· W4402834325 on OpenAlexaff
Tongzhou Yang, Qihao Li, Ning Zhang, Linlin Zhao, Fengye Hu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Computer networkVehicular communication systemsVehicular ad hoc networkResource (disambiguation)Distributed computingArtificial intelligenceWireless ad hoc networkTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a reliable federated learning (FL) scheme for vehicular communication networks. The scheme is named intelligent vehicle selection and resource optimization (IVSRO), which aims to improve the federate learning reliability by reducing the probability of incorrect packet transmission in mobility scenario, and determining the most suitable vehicle for learning based on the incorrect packet probability. Specifically, we introduce a FL model for the vehicular communication network and analyze the probability of incorrect packet transmission caused by dynamic channel changes under this network. In consideration of FL convergence accuracy, an optimization problem is formulated to minimize the incorrect packet transmission rate, which is achieved through selecting the optimal connected vehicles from the training set, allocating transmission power and wireless spectrum resources to the selected vehicles. By employing convergence analysis and determining the optimal power for each selected vehicle, the proposed optimization problem can be handled using a bipartite matching algorithm. Simulation results show that the identification accuracy of the proposed IVSRO scheme is higher than that of existing baseline schemes. The results of this study demonstrate how the proposed IVSRO scheme improve the reliability of the FL scheme in vehicular communication networks while considering the varying channel conditions and proper vehicle selection, making it valuable for FL implementations in the domains of intelligent transportation and road safety management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207