MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Cavity-Backed Polarization Reconfigurable Antenna Based on Liquid Metal

2024· article· en· W4402835281 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Yang, Qun Ding, Yuwei Zhang, Shu Lin, Xingqi Zhang, Xinyue Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReconfigurable antennaPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsAntenna (radio)OpticsDipole antennaComputer scienceCoaxial antennaPhysicsTelecommunicationsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a frequency and polarization reconfigurable dual-band antenna using liquid metal. The radiating part of the antenna consists of two orthogonally printed strip dipoles with consistent shapes and liquid metal. The two intersecting dipoles are fed by a coaxial cable, and the liquid metal is enclosed in channels made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). By utilizing the fluidity of liquid metal to change its position, the antenna can achieve linear polarization operation within the frequency range of 1.54 GHz to 1.87 GHz and 2.24 GHz to 3.02 GHz. In the circular polarization mode, its impedance bandwidth covers 1.51 GHz to 1.69 GHz, and the axial ratio bandwidth is 1.62 GHz to 1.74 GHz. To further enhance the performance of the antenna, four corner parasitic patches are introduced between the two intersecting dipoles. At the same time, the cavity-backed reflector of the antenna ensures its powerful directional radiation characteristics and improves gain. According to simulation results from the CST Microwave Studio®, the antenna achieves the peak gain of up to 9.92 dBi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and Analysis→French-language works237,207→