MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402838014 · doi:10.1016/j.jia.2024.09.036

Seaweed as a feed additive to mitigate enteric methane emissions in ruminants: Opportunities and challenges

2024· article· en· W4402838014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Agriculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethane emissionsMethaneEnvironmental scienceAnimal scienceEnvironmental chemistryBiologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Asparagopsis taxiformis has demonstrated significant potential in reducing enteric methane emissions in ruminants, achieving reductions of up to 99% in vitro and in vivo , primarily due to its bromoform content. • The application of seaweed as a feed additive faces challenges, including potential heavy metal contamination, environmental risks associated with bromoform, and the need for a sustainable cultivation and processing supply chain. • Further research is needed to identify low-bromoform seaweed species and investigate additional bioactive compounds to optimize methane mitigation strategies. Cutting farming-related methane emissions from ruminants is critical in the battle against climate change. Since scientists initially investigated the potential of marine macroalgae to reduce methane emissions, using seaweeds as an anti-methanogenic feed additive has become prevailing in recent years. Asparagopsis taxiformis is the preferred species because it contains a relatively higher concentration of bromoform. As a type of halogenated methane analogue, bromoform contained in A . taxiformis can specifically inhibit the activity of coenzyme M methyltransferase, thereby blocking the ruminal methanogenesis. However, bromoform is a potential toxin and ozone-depleting substance. In response, current research focuses on the effects of bromoform-enriched seaweed supplementation on ruminant productivity and safety, as well as the impact of large-scale cultivation of seaweeds on the atmospheric environment. The current research on seaweed still needs to be improved, especially in developing more species with low bromoform content, such as Bonnemaisonia hamifera , Dictyota bartayresii , and Cystoseira trinodis . Otherwise, seaweed is rich in bioactive substances and exhibits antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and other physiological properties, but research on the role of these bioactive compounds in methane emissions is lacking. It is worthy of deeper investigation to identify more potential bioactive compounds. As a new focus of attention, seaweed has attracted the interest of many scientists. Nevertheless, seaweed still faces some challenges as a feed additive to ruminants, such as the residues of heavy metals (iodine and bromine) and bromoform in milk or meat, as well as the establishment of a supply chain for seaweed cultivation, preservation, and processing. We have concluded that the methane-reducing efficacy of seaweed is indisputable. However, its application as a commercial feed additive is still influenced by factors such as safety, costs, policy incentives, and regulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it