Sleeping and lying-in-bed in underwater hotels: sensing (dis-)comfort in an alloútopian space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on a comprehensive view of underwater hotel bedrooms by reflecting on their common sensory dimensions and their objective capacities to shape the practice of sleep and lying-in-bed. Drawing from reflexive sensory ethnographic fieldwork, this article contributes to our collective understanding of performative and more-than-representational sensuous geographies by arguing that underwater hotel bedrooms replicate familiar environments through a variety of creature comforts, while simultaneously subverting the ordinary experience of hotel stays through multi-sensory exposure to unfamiliar, exciting, and in-part uncomfortable and anxiety-inducing environs. We base our argument on the original concept of alloútopia. An alloútopia (from the Greek alloú, for else or elsewhere, and topia, for place) is a realized utopia where humans and non-humans encroach upon each other’s lifeworld by way of an enclave which enables their temporary co-presence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".