Transplacental transmission of <i>Theileria equi</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
bacterial, fungal, mixed (bacterial and fungal) or viral and the aetiological pathogens were described.Results: Nine facilities recorded an infectious aetiology for 1 to 335 cases, with a total of 474 abortions of 851 (55.4%).The main infectious causes were bacterial with 389 cases (82.1%), including a quarter with macroscopic placentitis and approximately 40 bacterial species were isolated.Viral infections were identified in 42 cases (8.9%), with EHV-1 identified in the vast majority (90%).Mixed and fungal infections were diagnosed in 13 (2.7%) and 7 cases (1.5%), respectively.No specific pathogens was identified in 23 cases (4.8%) despite the presence of macroscopic infectious lesions. Main limitations:The data were only based on abortions that were examined at necropsy.It was not possible to compare facilities because case numbers in some facilities were low. Conclusions:The rate of infectious abortions was similar to that of previous studies conducted in France, Italy and the USA, but higher than that of the United Kingdom and Canada.Proportions of bacterial and viral infections have also varied from one study to another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".