MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402840228 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102854

Enhancing medical training in conflict zones and remote areas through innovation: introducing the Canadian Virtual Medical University Initiative

2024· article· en· W4402840228 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karim Qayumi, Seyedeh Toktam Masoumian Hosseini, Mohsen Masoumian Hosseini, Asadullah Nejat, Mohibullah Salih, Mammodullah Azimi, Sharif Forqani, B. H. Akbar, Ghulam Farooq, Najibullah Shafaq, Hussain Rustampoor, Nasrin Oryakhil, Masoud Rahmani, M Noora, Mohammad Nasir Jallah, Asmatullah Naebkhil, Zubaida Anwari Zhwak, S Aziz, Farid Ahmad Omar, Ahmad Mustafa Rahimi, Parwin Mansuri, Sumaira Yaftali, Nilofar Sadiq, Jahed Payman, Amanullah Arifzai, Mohammed Azim Azimee, Somaya Waqef, Stefan Wisbauer, Joffre Guzmán-Laguna, Alberto R. Ferreres

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsCanadian Virtual UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTraining (meteorology)Medical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The WHO projects a global shortage of 4.3 million physicians by 2030, with the largest deficits in developing and conflict-affected regions. Our aim is to train competent physicians rapidly and affordably through remote education programs. Methods: We developed an online medical training curriculum with four levels, focusing on different aspects of human body systems using a competency-based, student-centered approach. This study evaluates the first three levels; level four (internship) is outside this scope. The 105 medical students from eight Afghan universities were randomly assigned to nine groups. The curriculum includes Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) for the cardiovascular system: level 1 covers basic medical sciences, level 2 pathology and basic clinical skills, and level 3 full clinical competencies. EPAs were delivered asynchronously online via Lecturio, CyberPatient, and Zoom. The 30-day intervention included 4 h of weekly online classes for formative assessment, collaborative learning, and evaluation, supervised by medical faculty members. Virtual pre- and post-intervention evaluations used multiple-choice questions and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). We also conducted a satisfaction survey and open interview forum. Data triangulation from observations, surveys, and interviews validated curriculum effectiveness. The benchmarking method assessed cost-effectiveness. Findings: Pre- and post-intervention analysis showed a significant increase in clinical competencies and knowledge acquisition (P < 0.0001). The CyberPatient intervention improved clinical competency quality (P < 0.0001) and shortened decision-making time (P < 0.001). Cost analysis revealed that a virtual medical university would be 95% more cost-effective than traditional medical education. Interpretation: Integrating virtual technology with modern curriculum concepts in pre-internship years can effectively address healthcare training gaps and enhance education quality for healthcare workers at a low cost. Funding: Provided by CanHealth International. A UBC spin-off not-for-profit organization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207