MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402841739 · doi:10.3390/app14188558

Energy-Efficient Industrial Internet of Things in Green 6G Networks

2024· article· en· W4402841739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceInternet privacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research problem of this systematic review was whether green 6G networks can integrate energy-efficient Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) in terms of distributed artificial intelligence, green 6G pervasive edge computing communication networks and big-data-based intelligent decision algorithms. We show that sensor data fusion can be carried out in energy-efficient IoT smart industrial urban environments by cooperative perception and inference tasks. Our analyses debate on 6G wireless communication, vehicular IoT intelligent and autonomous networks, and energy-efficient algorithm and green computing technologies in smart industrial equipment and manufacturing environments. Mobile edge and cloud computing task processing capabilities of decentralized network control and power grid system monitoring were thereby analyzed. Our results and contributions clarify that sustainable energy efficiency and green power generation together with IoT decision support and smart environmental systems operate efficiently in distributed artificial intelligence 6G pervasive edge computing communication networks. PRISMA was used, and with its web-based Shiny app flow design, the search outcomes and screening procedures were integrated. A quantitative literature review was performed in July 2024 on original and review research published between 2019 and 2024. Study screening, evidence map visualization, and data extraction and reporting tools, machine learning classifiers, and reference management software were harnessed for qualitative and quantitative data, collection, management, and analysis in research synthesis. Dimensions and VOSviewer were deployed for data visualization and analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it