A novel multi-objective stochastic model and a novel hybrid metaheuristic for designing supply chain network under disruption risks to enhance supply chain resilience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supply chains are vulnerable to various disruption risks that can adversely affect their overall performance and objectives. This study addresses the challenge of designing a resilient and environmentally sustainable mixed open and closed-loop supply chain network that can withstand both operational and disruption risks. The research employs a bi-objective stochastic mathematical model to examine the balance between environmental sustainability and profitability within the SC. To mitigate the impact of disruptions, several resilience strategies are incorporated into the model, significantly reducing their adverse effects. Due to the inherent complexity of the problem, the study introduces a novel hybrid metaheuristic algorithm that combines ant colony optimization with teaching and learning-based optimization, named ACO-TLBO. Additionally, two other enhanced hybrid metaheuristics are proposed. The performance of these solution methods is assessed through various test problems, using specific performance metrics for comparison. Results reveal that the ACO-TLBO algorithm excels in generating high-quality, non-dominated solutions. The model's practical applicability is demonstrated through a case study in the tire industry, validating its effectiveness. The findings indicate that the proposed resilience strategies are crucial for minimizing the negative impacts of disruptions on SC objectives. Furthermore, the results underscore the importance of resilience in maintaining both sustainability and profitability within supply chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".