Uma entrevista sobre a interculturalidade no ensino das artes visuais: perspectivas e abordagens de apreciação estética no Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta entrevista tem por objetivo conhecer aspectos educacionais do Quebec voltados para uma perspectiva intercultural do ensino das Artes Visuais e identificar as abordagens de apreciação adotadas pela professora universitária Adriana de Oliveira em suas práticas de ensino. Desse modo, buscou-se entender a importância da interculturalidade nos projetos que relacionam a arte com questões sociais; a apreciação estética de imagens da contemporaneidade no contexto da educação básica; como esses aspectos são tratados na formação de futuros docentes de Artes Visuais; e como são explorados no cotidiano da escola por esses profissionais. Além disso, ao longo das perguntas buscou-se identificar como esses elementos podem ser explorados por docentes de arte no contexto da educação básica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".