MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402845697 · doi:10.31579/2692-9759/112

Congestive Coronary Heart Failure

2023· article· en· W4402845697 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rehan Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research and Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KarachiUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsHeart failureCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a continual condition characterized by the heart's inability to pump blood efficiently, which is essential for the buildup of fluid within the lungs and distinctive components of the body. It is a critical and regular health problem globally, affecting hundreds of thousands of people, primarily the elderly. CHF can cease owing to several underlying reasons, including coronary artery sickness, excessive blood strain, heart valve troubles, and cardiomyopathy. This summary aims to define CHF together with its pathophysiology, threat elements, clinical manifestations, analysis, and control. The pathophysiology of CHF includes weakening of the coronary heart muscle, which can also occur because of harm from preceding coronary heart attacks, extended high blood pressure, or special elements affecting coronary heart features. Because the pumping ability of the heart diminishes, blood glide in critical organs becomes inadequate, leading to symptoms, shortness of breath, fatigue, and fluid retention. Numerous risk factors contribute to the development of CHF, including age, coronary heart sickness, obesity, diabetes, smoking, and a sedentary lifestyle. Early diagnosis of CHF is critical for saving the patient from improving and decorating consequences. Diagnostic methods may additionally include medical records, physical examinations, imaging checks such as echocardiography, and blood tests to evaluate coronary heart characteristics and discover the underlying functionality. CHF control aims to alleviate signs and symptoms, sluggish sickness development, and enhance the pleasantness of life. Treatment strategies usually involve lifestyle changes such as adopting a coronary heart-wholesome diet, engaging in regular exercise, and quitting smoking. Medicinal pills such as diuretics, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers are prescribed to enhance coronary heart characteristics and decrease signs and signs. In severe cases, surgical interventions, such as coronary artery pass grafting or coronary heart transplantation, can be considered. As CHF is a continual condition, affected individual education and regular compliance with healthcare carriers are vital to display the ailment's improvement and regulate remedies. With improvements in scientific treatment plans and early detection, CHF analysis has advanced over the years. However, it remains a vast public health challenge, necessitating continuous research and cognizance efforts to beautify affected person consequences and decrease the load of this situation on affected human beings and healthcare systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology Research and ReportsSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207