MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping the vicious cycles of community gold mining (CGM): a case study of the CGM sites at Sukabumi Regency, Indonesia

2024· article· en· W4402845756 on OpenAlexaff
F Y Prabawa, D. Nurjaman, Wahyu Garinas, Umar Dani, A Hardianti, E B Budiman, Wahyu Hidayat, T Haryono, W Jannah, Zulfahmi

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsCentre for Excellence in Mining Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtuous circle and vicious circleEconomicsKeynesian economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Community Gold Mining (CGM) in Indonesia faces significant challenges, with a specific concern being the use of mercury. Mercury is a highly toxic chemical commonly utilized in the Trommel Mercury (TM) gold extraction method, known locally as the Glundung method. Although the government has initiated programs to reduce mercury usage, such as encouraging researchers to develop non-mercury gold extraction methods, progress has been slow, and the impact has been limited. The growth of new CGM sites is outpacing these efforts, leading to an increased use of mercury and unmanageable chemical risks. Previous research has identified a vicious cycle within the CGM sector. However, no existing model illustrates this cycle. This study seeks to map the scope of CGM at its essential stages and translate them into variables to create a causal and basic model. However, Sukabumi Regency in Indonesia hosts numerous CGM sites, and a case study was conducted in the Simpenan Sub-District between 2018 and 2020. A recent site visit in August 2023 revealed continued growth in CGM site numbers within the broader area. This growth corresponds to an increase in mercury released into the environment, which poses a growing threat to public health. The study employed ArcGIS and Powersim 10 System Dynamics Software, utilizing data collected through observations, investigative methods, and reference studies. The results include two significant contributions: first, a model of current CGM activities in the form of a Causal Loops Diagram (CLD) called “the Turtle Map CLD Model of the CGM”. Second, a model depicting “the vicious cycle of CGM” highlights problematic stages within CGM. Both models represent the current state of CGM in Indonesia, showcasing the existence of vicious cycles in ongoing CGM sites. These models can guide future efforts to identify progressive solutions, especially in support of programs aimed at reducing mercury usage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207