Recount Restriction and Identity in Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing crams the effects of the demarcation of identity revels in Canadian history where the question of Canadian national identity was sprouting, becoming a pointer that was more clearly defined and more intentionally sought out by Canadian artists and citizens. Atwood’s Surfacing can be considered in light of these historical developments, in sketching the establishment of recount restriction and not an avowal of the positive effects with such identifiers can bring. As a Canadian writer and a woman in particular, the narrator’s communal groupings stipulate her victimhood, a notion that explores in relation to Atwood’s major work of Canadian literary works. The narrator’s initial state of close proximity total psychological constriction is pinpointing the peril of social borders, and it is only in evading the identifiers that define her in peculiar of national, gender, and epistemological establish that she comes to a sort of completeness. This breaks out takes the form of a turn towards the chaotic world as a truly borderless space where it is doable to mendan inconsistent self.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".