MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Syncope : nouveautés pour la médecine de premier recours

2024· article· fr· W4402846433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amina Ahmed, Céline Spahr, Pawan Prasad, Julien Salamun, Stéphane Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Médicale Suisse · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyncope (phonology)MedicineHumanitiesArtCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syncope is a common reason for consultations and hospitali-zations. A diagnosis is established in 50 % of cases with the initial assessment. It can also be used to stratify the risk of cardiovascular events or recurrence, and their potentially fatal consequences. This stratification, based on European and American guidelines, is essential for guiding management. Various predictive scores exist, including the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS), which assesses the risk of serious events within 30 days. The CSRS has limitations in both emergency and outpatient settings. Current guidelines do not include specific scores, highlighting the importance of clinical judgment and the initial assessment for risk stratification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Médicale SuisseSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207