Optimizing contextual bandit hyperparameters: A dynamic transfer learning-based framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stochastic contextual bandit problem, recognized for its effectiveness in navigating the classic exploration-exploitation dilemma through ongoing player-environment interactions, has found broad applications across various industries. This utility largely stems from the algorithms’ ability to accurately forecast reward functions and maintain an optimal balance between exploration and exploitation, contingent upon the precise selection and calibration of hyperparameters. However, the inherently dynamic and real-time nature of bandit environments significantly complicates hyperparameter tuning, rendering traditional offline methods inadequate. While specialized methods have been developed to overcome these challenges, they often face three primary issues: difficulty in adaptively learning hyperparameters in ever-changing environments, inability to simultaneously optimize multiple hyperparameters for complex models, and inefficiencies in data utilization and knowledge transfer from analogous tasks. To tackle these hurdles, this paper introduces an innovative transfer learning-based approach designed to harness past task knowledge for accelerated optimization and dynamically optimize multiple hyperparameters, making it well-suited for fluctuating environments. The method employs a dual Gaussian meta-model strategy—one for transfer learning and the other for assessing hyperparameters’ performance within the current task —enabling it to leverage insights from previous tasks while quickly adapting to new environmental changes. Furthermore, the framework’s meta-model-centric architecture enables simultaneous optimization of multiple hyperparameters. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that this approach markedly outperforms competing methods in scenarios with perturbations and exhibits superior performance in 70% of stationary cases while matching performance in the remaining 30%. This superiority in performance, coupled with its computational efficiency on par with existing alternatives, positions it as a superior and practical solution for optimizing hyperparameters in contextual bandit settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".