Energy-efficient scheduling for a flexible job shop problem considering rework processes and new job arrival
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable production is not limited to environmental concerns only; It also provides economic benefits for businesses. Businesses that adopt sustainability principles can gain advantages in matters such as cost savings, competitive advantage, risk management, legal compliance and corporate reputation. Therefore, sustainability is no longer an option but a strategic imperative for businesses. For this reason, studies on energy-sensitive scheduling have started to increase recently. Another important factor in sustainable manufacturing is the reduction of scrap. Rework operations are required to reduce scrap. In this study, the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem (MO-FJSP) that considers energy efficiency is discussed. The created model aims to minimize the energy consumption, total machine workload and makespan. In this study, new job arrivals are considered as dynamic events. Another dynamic event added to the model is the addition of rework processes between operations to reduce the scrap rate when a scrap decision is made during the production stages. The enhanced NSGA II algorithm was applied to solve this problem. The enhanced NSGA II algorithm was applied to test instances and its performance was compared using some of the multi-objective performance indicators. These experimental results prove the effectiveness of the proposed solution method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it