An Insight into Ethanopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacological Properties of Genus Andrographis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Andrographis is a member of the family Acantheceae. It contains approximately 44 accepted species. Among them, Andrographis paniculata has been extensively studied during the last decade. The genus contains triterpenoids as the main class of compound, along with carotenoids, flavonoids, glycosides, xanthones, phenolic compounds, and fatty acid compounds. A. paniculata has been reported in Ayurveda, homeopathy, naturopathy, and Siddha. Traditionally, the genus is utilized in treating diarrhea, parasitic problems, liver illness, various skin problems, fever, snake bites, cough and many more. Pharmacological activities like antioxidant, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, hepatoprotective, antibacterial antiviral, anticancer, and antidiabetic have been documented in it with scientific evidence. Various components found in this genus show broad biological opportunities for novel medicinal medicines. Andrographolide is the major chemical constituent present in almost all the species. It has been reported for various pharmacological activities, mostly for antioxidant and anticancer. The genus is widely spread among India, China, Southeast Asia, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Thailand, and basically tropical and subtropical Asia. In India, it is found in Nallamala Hills, Andhra Pradesh, and South India. The present review has provided a critically analyzed vision of phytochemistry, traditional uses, and pharmacological applications of the genus Andrographis. The current information was collected systematically from scientific databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, ACS Publications, SciFinder, Science Direct, and Web of Science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".