MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402848198 · doi:10.1002/mop.34338

A wideband combined LNA‐filter in 22 nm FDSOI technology for satellite phased arrays

2024· article· en· W4402848198 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehrdad Gholami, Mohammad‐Reza Nezhad‐Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaC-COM Satellite SystemsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsWidebandCommunications satelliteSatelliteElectronic engineeringPhased arrayElectrical engineeringEngineeringAerospace engineeringAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article introduces a new, low cost and complexity, wideband Ku/K‐band combined low‐noise amplifier (LNA) Filter designed for large satellite phased array systems in advanced 22 nm Fully Depleted Silicon on Insulator Technology. The LNA achieves the required 20 dB gain through a two‐stage configuration using the cascode configuration. To effectively reject the transmitter (TX) signal, the LNA integrates 4 distributed parallel LC notch filters. Measured IP1dB at 29 GHz (TX band) demonstrates a 25 dB increase compared to IP1dB at 19 GHz (RX Band), with a remarkable 15 dB enhancement over the LNA without the filter. The 1‐dB gain bandwidth spans from 16 to 21 GHz, representing a 27% fractional bandwidth. Over the entire bandwidth, input/output return losses exceed 10 dB, maintaining a low noise figure (NF) of less than 3.5 dB. Inclusion of two filters at the input and middle of the first stage results in approximately 0.6 dB of increase in NF when compared to the LNA without the filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207