Effect of the Occupational Stress and Psychological Problems of Special Post Teachers in Zunyi City, Guizhou Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The investigation of the current status of occupational stress and psychological problems among special post-teachers in Zunyi City is crucial. This study provides insights into improving their working environment and promoting their well-being. This study aimed to 1) assess the level of occupational stress among teachers in special post teachers in Zunyi City, 2) study the status of psychological problems among teachers in special post teachers in Zunyi City, and 3) analyze the influence of occupational stress on psychological problems. This study used questionnaire surveys and interviews. A total of 324 special post-teachers answered the questionnaires. It served as a valid sample for this study, using the "Special Post Teacher Occupational Stress Questionnaire" as the research tool and supplemented by the "Self-Psychological Harmony Scale" for psychological problems data collection. Statistical methods such as frequency, percentage, average, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, and multiple regression analysis were employed for data analysis. The results revealed a significant positive correlation between occupational stress and psychological problems among special post-teachers, indicating that higher levels of occupational stress are associated with an increased likelihood of psychological problems. Additionally, notable differences in occupational stress and psychological problems were observed among special post teachers from different backgrounds. This study provides valuable insights into the relationship between occupational stress and psychological problems among special post-teachers, offering important implications for improving their work environment, reducing occupational stress, and promoting mental health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".