MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402850877 · doi:10.1177/10575677241282104

Book Review: <i>Changing the guard: Private influences, privatization, and criminal justice in Canada</i> by Luscombe, A., Walby, K., and Silva, D. (Eds.) LuscombeA., WalbyK., and SilvaD. (Eds.) (2022).Changing the guard: Private influences, privatization, and criminal justice in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press. x, 305 pp., $37.95(paperback), ISBN 9780774866842.

2024· article· en· W4402850877 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yvon Dandurand

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Criminal Justice Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuard (computer science)CriminologyCriminal justicePolitical scienceEconomic JusticeSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There remain many unanswered questions about the growing privatization of criminal justice in Canada and its social impact, yet these questions have been neglected by Canadian researchers.Changing of the Guards not only revisits these questions but also broadens them, sometimes in an unexpected way.The edited volume by Luscombe, Walby, and Silva is a very appreciated multidisciplinary contribution to an under-researched area.It fills some gaps in our knowledge and, perhaps more importantly, it proposes a fresh understanding of some of the key issues related to the increasingly central role private actors play in the public safety area and in the criminal justice system.A main theme of the book is the idea that privatization, in its many forms, is reshaping criminal justice institutions and processes in often harmful and anti-democratic ways.The other important theme is the realization that privatization contributes to the greater opacity of the criminal justice system and offers that system a new means of justifying its lack of transparency and avoiding accountability.The book is divided into four parts which reveal the extent to which institutional developments in the Canadian criminal justice system have opened the door to varying degrees of private influence and privatization.Part 1, "Private Provision and Purchase of Policing," examines the increasingly blurred lines between private and public policing and includes a chapter by Massimiliano Mulone who proposes a theoretical framework based on the theory of institutional isomorphism and suggests how the homogenization of public-private policing should be resisted.A second chapter, by Stewen Cohn, shows how the work of policing images of child exploitation is complex and involves ambiguous alliances between the state and non-state actors.It recounts how a non-governmental organization developed relationships with policing agencies and corporations and expanded its mandate to engage in activities alongside and at times in place of law enforcement agencies.A third chapter, by Erin Gibbs Van Brunschot, considers how elements of post-secondary education environments, including the dual challenges of autonomy and liability in the provision of security in that context, fortify the blurring between public and private security policing in the post-secondary environment.Part 2, "Private Actors in City Spaces and Surveillance," offers two chapters concerned with private security, surveillance, and governance in the urban context.A chapter on policing smart cities, by Jamie Duncan and Daniella Barreto, examines how the proliferation of for-profit datadriven technologies used by police can amplify the overcriminalization and underprotection of racialized and marginalized groups, while a chapter by Debra Mackinnon, using Vancouver as a case study, explores how city governments in collaboration with business improvement agencies implement a range of private, tech-based "solutions" and expand public-private governance and service delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Criminal Justice ReviewSame topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207