[Effect of oblique insertion at <i>ashi</i> point with long needle on joint function in female patients with knee osteoarthritis of early and middle stages].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: point with long needle and oral celecoxib capsule. METHODS: point (hard knots of quadriceps femoris, hamstring muscle, popliteal muscle, etc.) with long needle, once every other 3 days, twice a week, for a total of 2 weeks. Patients in the control group were treated with oral celecoxib capsules, 0.2 g each time, once a day for 2 weeks. Both groups started functional exercise after 2 weeks of treatment. The joint function score of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the two groups were observed before and after treatment and after 6 weeks of treatment completion (follow-up), the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) score was compared between the two groups before treatment and in follow-up, and the safety of the two groups was evaluated. RESULTS: <0.05). No serious adverse reactions occurred in both groups. CONCLUSION: point with long needle can improve the knee joint function and quality of life of female patients with early-middle-staqe KOA, which is better than oral celecoxib capsule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".