ALF: an asymmetric Lyot wavefront sensor for the ELT/METIS vortex coronagraph
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-common path quasi-static and differential aberrations are one of the big hurdles of direct imaging for current and future high-contrast imaging instruments. They increase speckle and photon noise thus reducing the achievable contrast and lead to a significant hit in HCI performance. The Mid-infrared ELT Imager and Spectrograph (METIS) will provide high-contrast imaging, including vortex coronagraphy in L, M and N bands, with the ultimate goal of directly imaging temperate rocky planets around the nearest stars. Ground-based mid-infrared observations are however also impacted by water vapor inhomogeneities in the atmosphere, which generate additional chromatic turbulence not corrected by the near-infrared adaptive optics. This additional source of wavefront error (WFE) significantly impacts HCI performance, and even dominates the WFE budget in N band. Instantaneous focal plane wavefront sensing is thus required to mitigate its impact. In this context, we propose to implement a novel wavefront sensing approach for the vortex coronagraph using an asymmetric Lyot stop and machine learning. The asymmetric pupil stop allows for the problem to become solvable, lifting the ambiguity on the sign of even Zernike modes. Choosing the Lyot plane instead of the entrance pupil for this mask is also not arbitrary: it preserves the rejection efficiency of the coronagraph and minimizes the impact of the asymmetry on the throughput. Last but not least, machine learning allows us to solve this inversion problem which is non-linear and lacks an analytical solution. In this contribution, we present our concept, our simulation framework, our results and a first laboratory demonstration of the technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".