MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402858437 · doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae082

Impact of whole-body and skeletal muscle composition on peak oxygen uptake in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4402858437 on OpenAlex
Veronika Schmid, Stephen Foulkes, Devyn Walesiak, Jing Wang, Corey R. Tomczak, Wesley J. Tucker, Siddhartha S. Angadi, Martin Halle, Mark J. Haykowsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Open · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
FundersFaculty of Nursing, University of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsHeart failureSkeletal muscleMeta-analysisComposition (language)CardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) has a major impact on exercise tolerance that may (in part) be due to abnormalities in body and skeletal muscle composition. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess how differences in whole-body and skeletal muscle composition between patients with HF and non-HF controls (CON) contribute to reduced peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). Methods and results The PubMed database was searched from 1975 to May 2024 for eligible studies. Cross-sectional studies with measures of VO2peak, body composition, or muscle biopsies in HF and CON were considered. Out of 709 articles, 27 studies were included in this analysis. Compared with CON, VO2peak [weighted mean difference (WMD): −9.96 mL/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI): −11.71 to −8.21), total body lean mass (WMD: −1.63 kg, 95% CI: −3.05 to −0.21), leg lean mass (WMD: −1.38 kg, 95% CI: −2.18 to −0.59), thigh skeletal muscle area (WMD: −10.88 cm2 , 95% CI: −21.40 to −0.37), Type I fibres (WMD: −7.76%, 95% CI: −14.81 to −0.71), and capillary-to-fibre ratio (WMD: −0.27, 95% CI: −0.50 to −0.03) were significantly lower in HF. Total body fat mass (WMD: 3.34 kg, 95% CI: 0.35–6.34), leg fat mass (WMD: 1.37 kg, 95% CI: 0.37–2.37), and Type IIx fibres (WMD: 7.72%, 95% CI: 1.52–13.91) were significantly higher in HF compared with CON. Absolute VO2peak was significantly associated with total body and leg lean mass, thigh skeletal muscle area, and capillary-to-fibre ratio. Conclusion Individuals with HF display abnormalities in body and skeletal muscle composition including reduced lean mass, oxidative Type I fibres, and capillary-to-fibre ratio that negatively impact VO2peak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it