MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402859102 · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2024.09.010

Negative regulation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase gene transcription in developing B cells by a PU.1-interacting intronic region

2024· article· en· W4402859102 on OpenAlexafffund
Allanna C. E. MacKenzie, Mia P. Sams, Jane H.-C. Lin, Carolina R. Batista, Michelle Gek Liang Lim, Chanpreet K. Riarh, Rodney P. DeKoter

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Immunology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCytidine deaminaseActivation-induced (cytidine) deaminaseTranscription (linguistics)CytidineGeneChemistryCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeSomatic hypermutationB cellPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID, encoded by Aicda ) plays a key role in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in germinal center B cells. However, off-target effects of AID are implicated in human leukemia and lymphoma. A mouse model of precursor B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia driven by deletion of the related transcription factors PU.1 and Spi-B revealed C->T transition mutations compatible with being induced by AID. Therefore, we hypothesized that PU.1 negatively regulates Aicda during B cell development. Aicda mRNA transcript levels were increased in leukemia cells and bone marrow pre-B cells lacking PU.1 and/or Spi-B, relative to wild type cells. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, PU.1 was found to interact with a negative regulatory region (R2–1) within the first intron of Aicda . CRISPR-Cas9-induced mutagenesis of R2–1 in cultured pre-B cells resulted in upregulation of Aicda in response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Mutation of the PU.1 interaction site and neighboring sequences resulted in reduced repressive ability of R2–1 in transient transfection analysis followed by luciferase assays. These results show that a PU.1-interacting intronic region negatively regulates Aicda transcription in developing B cells. • Aicda transcription is dysregulated in the absence of PU.1. • The transcription factor PU.1 interacts with the first intron of Aicda. • CRISPR-Cas9 mutation of a PU.1 site in Aicda intron 1 dysregulates transcription. • A PU.1-interacting site in intron 1 is a negative regulator of Aicda transcription.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular ImmunologySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207