MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402864119 · doi:10.12968/bjca.2024.0055

Using webinars to promote knowledge translation of evidence into practice

2024· article· en· W4402864119 on OpenAlexaff
Rosalie Magboo, Sheila O’Keefe-McCarthy, Tracey Bowden, Jill Bruneau, Yingyan Chen, Maria Hayes, Rafaela Batista dos Santos Pedrosa, Karen L. Then, Richard van Valen, Suzanne Fredericks

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Cardiac Nursing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEfficiency Analysis Using DEA
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of CalgaryBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranslation (biology)Knowledge translationClinical PracticeMedical educationEngineering ethicsKnowledge managementFamily medicineEngineeringComputer scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONNECT is a network of nursing and allied professional researchers, focused on strengthening collaborative cardiac surgery research through shared initiatives. In the fourth instalment of this five-article series, the authors describe a webinar series delivered in collaboration with the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.254
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Cardiac NursingSame topicEfficiency Analysis Using DEAFrench-language works237,207