MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402865920 · doi:10.6000/1929-5995.2024.13.13

Itaconic Acid-Based Hydrogels with Flame Retardancy and High-Temperature Resistance via Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing

2024· article· en· W4402865920 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rong Li, Runhao Yu, Chuan Liu, Kangan Hao, Anrong Huang, Chong Wu, Xiaoling Zuo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research Updates in Polymer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotopolymerization techniques and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGuizhou Minzu UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsItaconic acidPhotopolymerMaterials scienceSelf-healing hydrogelsChemical engineeringComposite materialPolymer chemistryPolymerMonomer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biomass-based hydrogels have received extensive attention due to their flame retardant properties and environmental friendliness. The dilemma that non-renewable energy resources are increasingly depleted, leads us to place high expectations on renewable natural clean energy, as well as to conduct in-depth research on the efficient utilization and green preparation processes for the clean energy. In this study, we introduce a green and sustainable method for the design and preparation of flame-retardant materials by integrating two new class of itaconic acid-based hydrogels in conjunction with the rapid vat photopolymerization (VP) 3D printing technology. The hydrogels prepared by this method exhibit exceptional flame retardancy, mechanical robustness and superior high-temperature resistance. This research provides novel strategies and essential guidance for the green synthesis and sustainable development of next-generation flame retardant materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research Updates in Polymer ScienceSame topicPhotopolymerization techniques and applicationsFrench-language works237,207