MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402885256 · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103782

Express shipments with autonomous robots and public transportation

2024· article· en· W4402885256 on OpenAlexaff
Umut Ermağan, Barış Yıldız, F. Sibel Salman

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Research Council
KeywordsRobotTransport engineeringPublic transportBusinessComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing urbanization, exploding e-commerce, heightened customer expectations, and the need to reduce the environmental impact of transportation ask for innovative last-mile delivery solutions. This paper explores a new express shipment model that combines public transportation with Autonomous Robots (ARs) and studies its real-time management. Under dynamic demand arrivals with short delivery time promises, we propose a rolling horizon framework and devise a machine learning-enhanced Column Generation (CG) methodology to solve the real-time AR dispatching problem. The results of our numerical experiments with real-world delivery demand data show the significant potential of the proposed system to reduce travel time, vehicle traffic, emissions, and noise. Our results also reveal the efficacy of the learning-based CG methodology, which provides almost the same quality solutions as the classical CG approach with much less computational effort. • A novel public transport- and Autonomous Robots (ARs)-based delivery system. • A machine learning-enhanced methodology to solve the real-time dispatching problem. • Exploration of three re-positioning policies for ARs to consider future orders. • Experiments with real-world data that show the potential of the proposed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation ReviewSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207