On the characterization of patterning in spruce budworm time-series data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I outline the “definitional problem” in forest insect outbreak analytics and show how it is related to the “counting problem” in dendroentomology and the “forecasting problem” in forest insect population dynamics, through the ubiquitous presence of non-stationary complex periodicity. Using real-world examples from the spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana Clem.) system, I show that regardless how outbreak patterning is characterized—whether by peak impact, cycle frequency, interval duration, or interval severity—the distribution in pattern attributes appears to be extremely variable, regardless how the data are processed through definitional filters. I show that this extreme variability is an unavoidable and key feature of the system’s dynamics and argue that it needs to be viewed as an object of study, instead of a nuisance problem to be swept under the rug. The single biggest opportunity for rapid gains in spruce budworm predictive ecology is determining the environmental and ecological factors that separate high-intensity from low-intensity outbreak cycling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".