Investigating microstructural changes between in vivo and perfused ex vivo marmoset brains using oscillating gradient and b‐tensor encoded diffusion <scp>MRI</scp> at 9.<scp>4 T</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate microstructural alterations induced by perfusion fixation in brain tissues using advanced diffusion MRI techniques and estimate their potential impact on the application of ex vivo models to in vivo microstructure. METHODS: We used oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) and b-tensor encoding diffusion MRI to examine in vivo and ex vivo microstructural differences in the marmoset brain. OGSE was used to shorten effective diffusion times, whereas b-tensor encoding allowed for the differentiation of isotropic and anisotropic kurtosis. Additionally, we performed Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the potential microstructural changes in the tissues. RESULTS: We report large changes (˜50%-60%) in kurtosis frequency dispersion (OGSE) and in both anisotropic and isotropic kurtosis (b-tensor encoding) after perfusion fixation. Structural MRI showed an average volume reduction of about 10%. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that these alterations could likely be attributed to extracellular fluid loss possibly combined with axon beading and increased dot compartment signal fraction. Little evidence was observed for reductions in axonal caliber. CONCLUSION: Our findings shed light on advanced MRI parameter changes that are induced by perfusion fixation and potential microstructural sources for these changes. This work also suggests that caution should be exercised when applying ex vivo models to infer in vivo tissue microstructure, as significant differences may arise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".