MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402895586 · doi:10.1080/01480545.2024.2405830

Di (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate and its metabolite-induced metabolic syndrome: a review of molecular mechanisms

2024· review· en· W4402895586 on OpenAlexaff
Sorour Ashaari, Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Neal M. Davies, Wael Almahmeed, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug and Chemical Toxicology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolitePhthalateChemistryMetabolic syndromeMetabolic pathwayPharmacologyBiochemistryMedicineMetabolismOrganic chemistryEndocrinologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic disorders, as multifactorial disorders, are induced by genetic susceptibility and exposure to environmental chemicals. Di (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a ubiquitous plasticizer, is well known as an endocrine-disrupting chemical in living organisms. In recent decades, researchers have focused on the potential of DEHP and its main metabolite (Mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate) (MEHP) to induce metabolic disorders. In the present review, we aimed to summarize studies regarding DEHP and MEHP-induced Metabolic syndrome (MetS) as well as address the involved mechanisms. METHODS: A search has been carried out in Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using appropriate keywords including 'Metabolic syndrome' or 'Metabolic disorder' or 'Obesity' or 'Hyperglycemia' or 'Hyperlipidemia' or 'Hypertension' or 'Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease' and 'DEHP' or 'Di (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate' or 'Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate' or 'MEHP' or 'Mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate'. Studies were chosen based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria are in vitro, in vivo, epidemiological studies, and English-written studies. Exclusion criteria are lack of access to the full text of studies, editorial articles, review articles, and conference articles. RESULTS: Animal studies indicate that DEHP and MEHP disrupt insulin hemostasis, increase glucose content, and induce hyperlipidemia and hypertension as well as obesity, which could lead to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). DEHP and its metabolite induce such effects directly through influence on nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) or indirectly through reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Both events led to the disruption of several molecular signaling pathways and subsequently metabolic syndrome (MetS). Furthermore, epidemiological studies showed that there was a correlation between DEHP metabolites levels and obesity, hyperglycemia, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: According to studies, DEHP and its main metabolite have the potential to induce MetS by involving various molecular mechanisms. Epidemiological studies concerning the association of DEHP and MetS in humans are not sufficient. Therefore, more studies are needed in this regard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug and Chemical ToxicologySame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207